That's likely to be the experience of many gamers who pick up this title without any familiarity with it. He sat down, tried to play it, found it extremely frustrating (if visually intriguing), and eventually gave up. So, I'll say pretty confidently, that you just don't know what you're talking about here. Looks like you didn't quite do ANY research on what you were playing. You seem to jump into it at the end of all this and have a skewed idea of the game. Over 4-million views with over 45-thousand likes. Trust me when I say he doesn't spend time for his 17-million subscribers playing games they don't want to see. Over 2.8-million views and over 43-thousand likes to that video. Take for instance one of DanTDM's play throughs.

The games keeps the clunkiness of the early access versions because it's been a growing audience of fans. It's been fun to play it as it changes, and that's half the fun. This game has been evolving with access to early alpha versions and beta versions, each of which were mostly different. I think you're actually jumping into a gaming counter culture you just don't understand. I in fact did state, it's a perfectly fine opinion to have, regardless of how mistaken it may be, and that I just happen to have the opinion of a higher expectation for a paid content reviewer. The point was made that people who don't know anything about, even those having a false expectation, are still valid content reviews. I have said one might have a different opinion, if they had played the alphas and betas and had a different expectation of the game.Р”Р„gain, the half-life as RTS was only an off the cuff example of someone who would have a mistaken impression or false expectation if they haven't read anything about it. Where did I say this wasn't fair to say? I've in fact said the exact opposite: You're entitled to your opinions. From the review the game seems like a broken frustrating mess, it's fair to call it one Also it isn't in early access anymore, games can still be iterated on after release because that's how it works now, but people expect a mostly finished product. Hello Neighbor has a Steam store page to let people know what the game is about, it bills itself as a stealth game where you break into your neighbor's house, it has quirky graphics that aren't unattractive. The example is incorrect because Half Life bills itself as a first person shooter, if you wanted to review it you don't have to do research because it might be a game that's broken on purpose, Half Life as a game stands on its own.

It just happens to be different from what you think. It's not incorrect for the notion of having a wrong idea of a game because of doing no research and having a failed expectation. And you wonder why you're being downvoted. So you use an incorrect example because you can't be bothered to put the effort into providing a coherent argument for your position. The wrong genre example as an off the cuff example of false expectations with an obvious no looking into what the game was.

Dantdm hello neighbor alpha 4